As a Dedicated Capitalist, But Medicare for All Is the Top Solution for American Healthcare

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average employee. Selecting the right medical coverage for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires a PhD in healthcare.

The Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Costly

According to recent research, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down due to partisan disputes regarding subsidies which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee earning average wages pays approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Not if you contrast it to what average American pays. I know multiple clients that are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that in inclusive programs, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and job loss protection along with supporting healthcare facilities. When including those costs versus our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. There would be both worker and employer contribution. And, like many our government's defense, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the system could be managed by private contractors instead of a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would make management much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complicated (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – contrasted with the current system where they have to decipher the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for companies since we wouldn't have access to our employees' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that government has a significant role in our lives, including national security to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of American employees and fund half the economic output. It enables employees to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a better and less expensive approach both for managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect in this present circumstances is that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and agree that big changes need to happen.

Timothy Mitchell
Timothy Mitchell

Elara is a seasoned outdoor guide and gear tester who has explored trails across Europe and North America, sharing practical insights for modern adventurers.